Race-based preferences during college admissions are gone, jettisoned by the Supreme Court. Now universities are under pressure to drop favorable treatment for donors and children of alumni. But what about recruited athletes, whose admission advantage far outstrips any of the above categories of student? At Harvard, for instance, the chances of getting in move from less than 1% to 86% if coveted by a coach.
Can special admissions for recruited athletes be preserved? Should they? Our panels explore the societal implications of preferred treatment of athletes, from the contributions they make to campus life to the downstream reshaping of the youth sports industry, and considers: What treatment makes sense now?
Watch our conversation with:
- Kirsten Hextrum, Oregon State University assistant professor, author of “Special Admissions: How College Sports Recruitment Favors White Suburban Athletes”
- Tyler Ransom, University of Oklahoma associate professor, co-author of study of athlete admissions at Harvard cited in SCOTUS decision on race-based admissions
- Richard Southall, College Sports Research Institute director, University of South Carolina
- Jon Solomon, Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program editorial director (moderator)
- Tom Farrey, Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program executive director (moderator)
Future of Sports is a conversation series, hosted by the Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program, that helps stakeholders think through key questions shaping the future of our games, the sports industry and its impact on society. Past events examined the future of football, a series on college athlete pay including the government’s role and the future of name, image and likeness rights, sports betting, athlete activism, coaching, the U.S. Olympic movement, women’s pro sports
, children’s rights in sports, and the future of sports in the climate crisis. Contact Sports & Society Program Editorial Director Jon Solomon at [email protected] with questions or inquiries.
Thank you to Axios Sports for its support as media partner of the Future of Sports series.
Race-based preferences during college admissions are gone, jettisoned by the Supreme Court. Now universities are under pressure to drop favorable treatment for donors and children of alumni. But what about recruited athletes, whose admission advantage far outstrips any of the above categories of student? At Harvard, for instance, the chances of getting in move from less than 1% to 86% if coveted by a coach.
Can special admissions for recruited athletes be preserved? Should they? Our panels explore the societal implications of preferred treatment of athletes, from the contributions they make to campus life to the downstream reshaping of the youth sports industry, and considers: What treatment makes sense now?
Join us Thursday, Aug. 3 (12-1 pm EST) for this virtual discussion. Speakers include:
- Kirsten Hextrum, Oregon State University assistant professor, author of “Special Admission: How College Sports Recruitment Favors White Suburban Athletes”
- Tyler Ransom, University of Oklahoma associate professor, co-author of study of athlete admissions at Harvard cited in SCOTUS decision on race-based admissions
- Linda Flanagan, author of “Take Back the Game: How Money and Mania Are Ruining Kids’ Sports – and Why It Matters”
- Ramogi Huma, National College Players Association executive director, former UCLA football player
- Richard Southall, College Sports Research Institute director, University of South Carolina
- Jon Solomon, Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program editorial director (moderator)
- Tom Farrey, Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program executive director (moderator)
Register here to attend the free event.
Companion content
- End admissions preferences for athletes (Inside Higher Ed)
- 1 in 8 admitted students from top 1% by income are athletes; it’s 1 in 20 for bottom 60% (New York Times)
- The one group with a huge advantage in college admissions (CNN)
- Legacy and Athlete Preferences at Harvard (National Bureau of Economic Research)
- The Gentrification of College Hoops (andscape)
Future of Sports is a conversation series, hosted by the Aspen Institute Sports & Society Program, that helps stakeholders think through key questions shaping the future of our games, the sports industry and its impact on society. Past events examined the future of football, a series on college athlete pay including the government’s role and the future of name, image and likeness rights, sports betting, athlete activism, coaching, the U.S. Olympic movement, women’s pro sports
, children’s rights in sports, and the future of sports in the climate crisis. Contact Sports & Society Program Editorial Director Jon Solomon at [email protected] with questions or inquiries.
Thank you to Axios Sports for its support as media partner of the Future of Sports series.
